Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tawfiq Al- Ghussein's avatar

Thank you for returning to your 2023 argument with clarity and consistency. The central point you make remains the essential one: without reciprocal recognition of national legitimacy and equal political rights for all who live between the river and the sea, no ceasefire or military posture can produce lasting security. What has unfolded since only underscores that leaderships which relied on division and the absence of political horizon cannot be the ones to construct a different future. The emerging framework for Gaza, including a technocratic administration, an international security presence, and phased Israeli withdrawal, is fragile and depends on sustained international leverage. Yet it cannot succeed if the West Bank continues to deteriorate under de facto annexation and unchecked settler violence. Stabilisation in Gaza and political viability for the Palestinian Authority are indivisible. Your emphasis on political renewal on both sides is therefore not rhetorical but structural. The alternative is the continuation of a cycle that has already demonstrated its catastrophic limits.

John Costello's avatar

Sadat? So Israel cozys up to the same beasts as US. Sadat looked great through our media lens, but he was no better than Pahlavi or Saddam, and liberal Zionists, whether in Israel or US, whether Jew or Gentile, are sanguine with any status quo that poses no direct threat to Israel, no matter how repressive it is. The Golden Gaza plan is an orwellian travesty, but it should be serviceable for a while given how decimated all resistance to the US Israel hegemon is. So thank you good neighbor, for finding another way forward that's wholly inadequate but equally unassailable.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?